A clearer way to explain the launch trade-off
A source-specific claim with enough context to shape an original post.
Evidence-led discovery
Aboveboard brings current research, supported public conversations and rising source evidence into focused views for one account and campaign. Inspect why each item surfaced, then save it, research deeper or start an editable post or reply for review.
A source-specific claim with enough context to shape an original post.
A clear source that leaves room for a recommendation shaped by the brand.
Useful source material to test against the campaign context before drafting.
Trusted industry source·Published recently
The source documents a practical decision that can support a distinct point of view.
Original source and supporting passage available
One workspace, three ways to discover
Post ideas, Conversations and Rising answer different questions. Saved keeps deliberate picks from all three in one place.
Turn current research and trusted sources into cited candidates for the selected account and campaign.
Search supported public threads, inspect activity and relevance, then prepare a useful reply rather than automated outreach.
See fresh, relevant evidence ordered with corroboration and workspace novelty—without calling ordinary freshness momentum.
From a query to a dependable habit
A supported Bluesky or Reddit conversation query can become a daily check without turning discovery into an unbounded stream.
Watching follows provider limits and the saved freshness window; it cannot promise a new result on every check.Search
Watch
Review
Public conversations, with honest scope
Conversation cards keep platform, author context, published age, replies, reactions and latest known activity together before a reply draft begins.
Meets the workspace's configured age, reply and latest-activity thresholds.
Still inside the fresh window without enough measured activity for Hot.
Older or unknown-date evidence stays available instead of being silently discarded.
If a narrow time window yields too little, Aboveboard names the wider window and keeps less-relevant results behind a clear disclosure.
Reply momentum appears only after two real snapshots produce a positive rate; missing activity remains missing.
Open the public source, inspect the evidence and draft a reply for human review when the thread is eligible.
Official platform reads · honest age · measured replies and reactions
Rising, without the trend theatre
Rising combines brand relevance with time-bounded freshness, independent-source corroboration and whether your workspace already covered a similar angle.
Cited articles, studies, news and fresh relevant conversations can all qualify. A social-video label describes format; it is not an admission gate.
A 72-hour prime window and 14-day secondary window keep age explicit.
Separate domains can strengthen a signal without turning repetition into proof of an outcome.
Similar drafts and published posts lower the priority of a repeated angle.
The next action fits the evidence
The selected item determines the right editable starting point; a person still decides what is written, approved and sent.
Composer receives the selected account, linked campaign, the card's specific verdict and one visible source URL where available—not a pasted source passage.
The reply path stages Evidence, Draft and Approve so context remains inspectable and outreach never becomes automatic.
A cited source can become a post about today; a qualifying conversation can become a reply draft. Both keep the same human-review boundary.
Ideas guides attention. It does not guarantee performance, establish causation or publish or send by itself.
Useful at different review desks
Permissions separate inspection, research, queue decisions and generation so collaboration does not blur who can act.
Move from a cited claim, question or signal into editable work without outsourcing the point of view.
Choose the correct account and campaign before research, ranking or handoff begins.
Keep source, reason, state and next action clear enough for another person to inspect.
Ideas questions
Post ideas gathers current research and trusted-source evidence; Conversations shows searchable or imported Bluesky and Reddit threads; Rising prioritizes fresh, relevant evidence; Saved keeps deliberate picks from those three views.
They come from configured sources, saved searches and captured public evidence for the selected account and campaign. Rising can include cited articles, studies, news and fresh relevant conversations; it is not limited to social-video sources.
Conversation search currently supports Bluesky and Reddit through official access paths. You can search either network, import a thread or save a supported query for daily checks. Other networks are not searchable in Ideas yet.
Rising considers brand relevance, freshness, independent-source corroboration and whether your workspace has covered a similar angle. Momentum affects the order only when verified metric history exists; otherwise Aboveboard states that it is using freshness and relevance.
It builds a cited brief from trusted sources or all available sources, within the item limit you choose. A research run is metered at the current research-run rate listed on Pricing.
A post handoff seeds Composer with the source-specific verdict, selected account, linked campaign and one visible source URL where available; the writer can keep, move or remove that citation. A conversation opens an editable reply path. Publishing or sending always requires human review.
Start with one channel
The Free plan includes the complete loop on 1 channel: sources, opportunities, drafts, review and publishing. Use the included 60 credits for roughly 15 post drafts, or mix smaller actions. No card required.